{"id":1109,"date":"2026-06-11T02:59:42","date_gmt":"2026-06-11T01:59:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/?p=1109"},"modified":"2026-06-11T02:59:43","modified_gmt":"2026-06-11T01:59:43","slug":"india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"India Digital Onboarding Benchmark Report 2026: What the Data Tells Us About Completion, Fraud, and Verification Performance"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The Digital Onboarding India Benchmark <\/a>Report 2026 examines onboarding completion rates, verification accuracy, fraud patterns, and customer drop-off trends across India’s financial services ecosystem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Digital onboarding is the moment where financial services are won or lost. A customer who completes onboarding becomes a revenue relationship. A customer who drops out at the KYC step becomes a competitor’s acquisition. Identity fraud slipping through KYC <\/a>becomes a liability. The gap between high-performing and median onboarding stacks in India is significant \u2014 and the gap in fraud rates between them is larger. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

This benchmark report draws on publicly available data, regulatory publications, and industry analysis to provide reference points for onboarding completion rates, verification accuracy, fraud incidence, and the controls that distinguish the best-performing programmes from the rest. If you are building or optimising a digital onboarding programme in India in 2026, these are the numbers to measure yourself against.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Table of Contents<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. The State of Digital Onboarding in India: Key Context<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Onboarding Completion Rates: Industry Benchmarks by Sector<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Verification Accuracy: Aadhaar, PAN, and Document Verification Performance<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Dropout Analysis: Where and Why Customers Abandon Onboarding<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  5. Fraud Rates at Onboarding: What Is Normal and What Is Not<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  6. The Attributes of High-Performing Onboarding Programmes<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  7. Key Takeaways<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  8. Frequently Asked Questions<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  9. Conclusion<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    The State of Digital Onboarding in India: Key Context<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    India’s Aadhaar-based eKYC infrastructure processed 250 million eKYC transactions in a single month in 2024, reflecting the scale at which digital identity verification now operates. The Aadhaar system covers approximately 94.8 percent of India’s population across all age groups, providing near-universal coverage for the adult population that forms the primary target market for financial services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Despite this infrastructure advantage, onboarding completion rates in India<\/a>‘s financial services sector remain variable. Mobile penetration is high, but camera quality and internet connectivity are inconsistent across the user base \u2014 creating technical friction that disproportionately affects onboarding flows requiring high-quality video or image capture. The shift to mobile-first onboarding has resolved some of this through native camera integration but has introduced new challenges around device fraud and mobile-based spoofing attacks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The regulatory environment has added complexity without reducing the need for efficiency: the RBI’s V-CIP requirements, the DPDP Act’s consent obligations, and the Digital Lending Guidelines’ data minimisation requirements must all be implemented in onboarding flows that retain the user. The organisations that have done this best are those that integrated compliance requirements into the UX design process rather than bolting them on as friction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Onboarding Completion Rates: Industry Benchmarks by Sector<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Completion rate benchmarks vary significantly by product type and customer segment. For digital lending products \u2014 personal loans, BNPL \u2014 completion rates at the onboarding stage (from application initiation to KYC completion) range from 35 to 65 percent across the industry. The wide range reflects significant variation in verification approach, UI\/UX design, and the complexity of the product’s eligibility requirements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    For savings and payments products \u2014 digital wallets, UPI-linked accounts \u2014 completion rates are typically higher, 55 to 75 percent, because the verification requirements are less complex and the user motivation is clearer. For investment platforms \u2014 mutual funds, stock trading accounts \u2014 completion rates are lower, 25 to 45 percent, because the SEBI KYC requirements add document submission steps that create dropout points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The top quartile of performers in each category achieves completion rates 15 to 20 percentage points above the median. The distinguishing factors are consistently: OCR accuracy (fewer re-submission prompts), liveness check first-pass success rate (fewer failed liveness attempts before the user abandons), and the number of steps in the verification journey (fewer steps, fewer opportunities to drop out).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Verification Accuracy: Aadhaar, PAN, and Document Verification Performance<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Aadhaar eKYC, when accessed through direct UIDAI integration, achieves identity verification<\/a> accuracy rates above 99 per cent for OTP-based authentication and above 97 per cent for biometric authentication (the lower rate for biometric authentication reflects the proportion of users with worn fingerprints or registration-quality issues). These rates represent the performance of the underlying UIDAI infrastructure \u2014 the provider’s accuracy is bounded by UIDAI’s database quality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    For PAN verification, real-time Income Tax Department database queries return match results with very high accuracy for correctly formatted PAN numbers. The failure modes are primarily user error (entering incorrect PAN numbers) rather than database failures. The more important accuracy dimension is name matching \u2014 whether the name on the PAN matches the applicant’s name as provided. Fuzzy name matching (handling of transliteration variations, abbreviated names, and middle name inclusion) is where provider implementations diverge significantly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    For document OCR \u2014 extracting data from photographs of identity documents or financial documents \u2014 accuracy rates vary substantially with image quality, lighting, and document condition. Best-in-class providers achieve field-level accuracy rates of 97 to 99 percent for high-quality images of standard Indian government identity documents. Accuracy drops significantly for handwritten documents, low-light captures, or documents with worn surfaces.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Dropout Analysis: Where and Why Customers Abandon Onboarding<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Dropout analysis across Indian financial services onboarding flows consistently identifies four high-dropout points. The first is the consent and data permission screen: users who see a long list of permissions being requested \u2014 particularly data access permissions that seem disproportionate to the product \u2014 drop out at rates of 15 to 25 percent. The DPDP Act’s requirements around specific, granular consent disclosure, while correct from a data protection perspective, can increase friction at this point if not designed carefully.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The second dropout point is document upload: users who are required to upload clear, correctly oriented photographs of identity documents fail this step at rates of 20 to 35 percent if the OCR system has high image quality requirements and provides unclear re-submission instructions. Guided capture \u2014 real-time feedback on document positioning, lighting, and focus before capture \u2014 reduces this dropout rate by 8 to 15 percentage points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The third dropout point is liveness detection: users who fail the liveness check on the first attempt \u2014 due to poor lighting, incorrect positioning, or confusion about the challenge \u2014 abandon at rates of 30 to 45 percent. First-pass liveness success rates above 90 percent, achievable with passive liveness and good UI guidance, are the benchmark for high-performing programmes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The fourth dropout point is waiting time: any step that requires a user to wait more than 20 seconds for a verification result sees 10 to 20 percent additional dropout. API response time is a direct driver of onboarding conversion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Fraud Rates at Onboarding: What Is Normal and What Is Not<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Fraud rates at onboarding vary by product risk profile and verification rigour. For digital lending products \u2014 where the fraud motivation is highest \u2014 industry-wide application fraud rates (fraudulent applications as a proportion of total applications) are estimated at 1 to 3 percent by volume, but 5 to 8 percent by disbursed value, reflecting the concentration of fraud in larger-ticket applications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    For platforms with minimal verification, these rates are significantly higher \u2014 fraud in some lower-verification BNPL and consumer credit programmes has been reported at 8 to 12 percent of disbursed value in segments with known fraud exposure. For platforms with comprehensive multi-signal verification (identity + document + device + bureau + behavioural), application fraud rates of below 0.5 percent by volume are achievable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Document fraud specifically \u2014 submissions of altered bank statements or salary slips \u2014 is estimated to account for 40 to 60 percent of application fraud by value in income-document-dependent underwriting. This is the single fraud type with the largest individual impact on a per-case basis, and the one where verification investment has the highest measurable ROI.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The Attributes of High-Performing Onboarding Programmes<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    The digital onboarding programmes in India that achieve both high completion rates and low fraud rates share a consistent set of design principles. First, progressive verification: only the minimum verification required for the initial product is conducted at onboarding, with additional verification triggered by subsequent product access or risk events. This reduces initial friction while maintaining compliance for higher-risk activities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Second, guided capture: real-time feedback on document photography quality before submission, step-by-step liveness guidance, and clear error messages with specific correction instructions \u2014 not generic “verification failed” alerts \u2014 reduce dropout at each verification step.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Third, smart fallbacks: when an automated verification step fails \u2014 the Aadhaar OTP is not received, the document OCR fails, the liveness check does not pass \u2014 a clearly designed alternative pathway (manual review queue, alternate document type, OTP to alternate number) is available rather than a hard failure that ends the session.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Fourth, verification concurrency: running identity, document, and device checks in parallel rather than sequentially reduces total verification time, which directly reduces dropout at the waiting step. A verification flow that takes 45 seconds from document submission to approval performs significantly better than one that takes 180 seconds, even with identical accuracy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Mobile-First Onboarding: India-Specific Design Considerations<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    India is a mobile-first market: over 90 percent of digital financial services onboarding attempts occur on mobile devices, and a significant proportion of those devices are mid-range Android handsets with camera capabilities, processing power, and connectivity that differ materially from the flagship devices on which many onboarding flows are designed and tested.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The onboarding performance gaps that emerge on mid-range devices are predictable and preventable. Camera resolution affects OCR accuracy <\/a>\u2014 a low-resolution camera capture of an identity document produces an image that is harder for OCR to read accurately, increasing the proportion of users who fail the document capture step. Processing power affects liveness detection \u2014 active liveness challenges that require real-time video processing can be slow or unreliable on low-end devices, creating a user experience that increases abandonment. Connectivity affects API response time \u2014 a 3G connection increases the waiting time between submission and verification result, raising abandonment rates at the waiting step.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    High-performing mobile onboarding programmes for the Indian market address these gaps through: compressed, optimised API payloads that reduce data transfer requirements; guided document capture with real-time quality feedback that minimises the need for re-capture attempts; passive liveness as the default (lower processing requirement than active liveness challenges); and progressive loading states with clear time indicators that manage user expectations during API response waits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Testing on representative device profiles \u2014 not just the latest iPhone and Samsung Galaxy, but the Redmi Note, Realme, and older Xiaomi models that represent the median Indian financial services user’s device \u2014 is a non-negotiable step for any organisation building an onboarding flow intended for mass-market Indian users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Key Takeaways<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
      \n
    • Onboarding completion rates range from 35\u201365% for digital lending and 55\u201375% for payments products \u2014 the top quartile achieves 15\u201320 percentage points above the median through OCR accuracy, liveness first-pass success, and reduced step count.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Application fraud rates for digital lending are estimated at 1\u20133% by volume industry-wide; platforms with comprehensive multi-signal verification achieve below 0.5%.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Document fraud accounts for 40\u201360% of application fraud by value in income-document-dependent underwriting \u2014 the highest-ROI single verification investment.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • The four highest dropout points are: consent permissions screen, document upload quality failure, liveness check first-attempt failure, and waiting time over 20 seconds.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • High-performing programmes use progressive verification, guided document capture, smart fallback paths, and parallel verification checks \u2014 not sequential, high-friction verification chains.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

      Conclusion<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      The gap between high-performing and median digital onboarding programmes in India is not primarily a technology gap. It is an integration and design gap: the organisations at the top of the completion and fraud-rate distribution have thought carefully about verification sequence, user experience, fallback design, and the layering of risk signals. The technology to support high completion rates and low fraud rates is available \u2014 the question is whether it has been assembled and configured to work as a coherent system rather than a sequence of individual checks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Frequently Asked Questions<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
      \n
      \n
      \n
      Q: What is a good digital onboarding completion rate in India?<\/strong><\/h6>\n
      <\/div>
      <\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
      \n

      Completion rates vary by sector: 35\u201365% for digital lending, 55\u201375% for digital payments and wallets, 25\u201345% for investment platforms. The top quartile achieves 15\u201320 percentage points above the median by optimising OCR accuracy, liveness first-pass success rate, and the number of steps in the verification journey.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n
      \n
      \n
      Q: What causes the highest dropout rates in digital KYC onboarding?<\/strong><\/h6>\n
      <\/div>
      <\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
      \n

      The four highest dropout points are: long consent\/permission screens (15\u201325% dropout), document upload failures due to image quality issues (20\u201335% dropout), liveness check failures on the first attempt (30\u201345% dropout among those who fail), and verification waiting times over 20 seconds (10\u201320% additional dropout). Each can be materially reduced through UX and technology investment.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

      \n
      \n
      \n
      Q: What is the typical fraud rate for digital lending applications in India?<\/strong><\/h6>\n
      <\/div>
      <\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
      \n

      Industry-wide application fraud rates for digital lending are estimated at 1\u20133% by volume and 5\u20138% by disbursed value. Platforms with comprehensive multi-signal verification (identity + document + device + bureau + behavioural signals) achieve below 0.5% application fraud by volume. Document fraud \u2014 forged bank statements and salary slips \u2014 accounts for an estimated 40\u201360% of application fraud by value.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

      <\/p>\n\n\n\n

      <\/p>\n\n\n\n

      <\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Digital Onboarding India Benchmark Report 2026 examines onboarding completion rates, verification accuracy, fraud patterns, and customer drop-off…","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":1110,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"csco_singular_sidebar":"","csco_page_header_type":"","csco_page_load_nextpost":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[418,416,417,419],"class_list":["post-1109","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-resources","tag-customer-onboarding","tag-digital-onboarding","tag-digital-onboarding-india","tag-fintech-onboarding","cs-entry"],"yoast_head":"\nDigital Onboarding India Benchmark Report 2026<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Digital Onboarding India Benchmark 2026: Completion rates, KYC accuracy, fraud trends, dropout patterns, and verification performance.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Digital Onboarding India Benchmark Report 2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Digital Onboarding India Benchmark 2026: Completion rates, KYC accuracy, fraud trends, dropout patterns, and verification performance.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"BeFiSc\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-11T01:59:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-11T01:59:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Blog-Banner-Images-Main-2.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Chailsee yadav\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Chailsee yadav\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Digital Onboarding India Benchmark Report 2026","description":"Digital Onboarding India Benchmark 2026: Completion rates, KYC accuracy, fraud trends, dropout patterns, and verification performance.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Digital Onboarding India Benchmark Report 2026","og_description":"Digital Onboarding India Benchmark 2026: Completion rates, KYC accuracy, fraud trends, dropout patterns, and verification performance.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/","og_site_name":"BeFiSc","article_published_time":"2026-06-11T01:59:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-11T01:59:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Blog-Banner-Images-Main-2.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Chailsee yadav","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Chailsee yadav","Estimated reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/"},"author":{"name":"Chailsee yadav","@id":"https:\/\/web.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/#\/schema\/person\/6b4fa6213a7742947b3a7717dcd5615e"},"headline":"India Digital Onboarding Benchmark Report 2026: What the Data Tells Us About Completion, Fraud, and Verification Performance","datePublished":"2026-06-11T01:59:42+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-11T01:59:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/"},"wordCount":2056,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/web.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Blog-Banner-Images-Main-2.png","keywords":["Customer Onboarding","Digital Onboarding","Digital Onboarding India","Fintech Onboarding"],"articleSection":["Resources"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/","url":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/","name":"Digital Onboarding India Benchmark Report 2026","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/web.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Blog-Banner-Images-Main-2.png","datePublished":"2026-06-11T01:59:42+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-11T01:59:43+00:00","description":"Digital Onboarding India Benchmark 2026: Completion rates, KYC accuracy, fraud trends, dropout patterns, and verification performance.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Blog-Banner-Images-Main-2.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Blog-Banner-Images-Main-2.png","width":1200,"height":630},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/india-digital-onboarding-benchmark-2026\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"India Digital Onboarding Benchmark Report 2026: What the Data Tells Us About Completion, Fraud, and Verification Performance"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/web.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/#website","url":"https:\/\/web.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/","name":"BeFiSc","description":"Founder Articles","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/web.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/web.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/web.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/#organization","name":"BeFiSc","url":"https:\/\/web.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/web.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/befiscsymbol.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/befiscsymbol.png","width":508,"height":120,"caption":"BeFiSc"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/web.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/web.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/#\/schema\/person\/6b4fa6213a7742947b3a7717dcd5615e","name":"Chailsee yadav","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1bd43e74edffa6494c6b2aa707e92cd52e04c1319d36fb8b57e2945bb6ca2a2c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1bd43e74edffa6494c6b2aa707e92cd52e04c1319d36fb8b57e2945bb6ca2a2c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1bd43e74edffa6494c6b2aa707e92cd52e04c1319d36fb8b57e2945bb6ca2a2c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Chailsee yadav"},"url":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/author\/chailsee-yadav\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1109","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1109"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1109\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1111,"href":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1109\/revisions\/1111"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1110"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1109"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1109"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.befisc.com\/fintechsherlock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1109"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}